Trump Jr. Digs Up Old Video of Whoopi, Teaches Her to NEVER Mess With His Kids Again

Looks like that ugly fossil that is Whoopi Goldberg has finally poked the wrong person.

We have now come to expect that there’s nothing Whoopi and the gang of yentas on ‘The View’ won’t say to smear conservatives. And they have no issue whatsoever regurgitating the vilest Democrat talking points while they complain about Trump being mean and saying mean things.

But Young Conservatives has recently reported that what has to be the leader of the yentas, Whoopi Goldberg, had the nerve to accuse Trump Jr.’s son of having ‘abusive tendencies’. And she had the nerve to do this without absolutely any proof or evidence to back up her claim. It’s the Democrat way!

So because Donald Trump Jr. is a lot like his father, he wasted no time in replying to this has been.

From The Daily Caller:

“Donald Trump Jr. did not hold back his thoughts when he responded to Whoopi Goldberg after she implied that his sons must have abusive tendencies.

“You only worry about this for your child if you think your child has these tendencies,” Goldberg shared on “The View” Tuesday. “If you think your child is not someone who is assaulting people, it shouldn’t be a concern for you.”

“@WhoopiGoldberg, instead of insinuating that my sons are potential future abusers, you might want to explain why you defended actual child rapist Roman Polanski? ‘I don’t believe it was ‘rape’ rape.’ – Whoopi Goldberg on Roman Polanski,” Trump Jr. captioned his post on Instagram, along with a throwback clip from when “The View” co-host appeared to be defending Polanski over allegations that he had sex with a minor.

“Donald Trump Jr. did not hold back his thoughts when he responded to Whoopi Goldberg after she implied that his sons must have abusive tendencies.

“You only worry about this for your child if you think your child has these tendencies,” Goldberg shared on “The View” Tuesday. “If you think your child is not someone who is assaulting people, it shouldn’t be a concern for you.”

“@WhoopiGoldberg, instead of insinuating that my sons are potential future abusers, you might want to explain why you defended actual child rapist Roman Polanski? ‘I don’t believe it was ‘rape’ rape.’ – Whoopi Goldberg on Roman Polanski,” Trump Jr. captioned his post on Instagram, along with a throwback clip from when “The View” co-host appeared to be defending Polanski over allegations that he had sex with a minor.

“He added, “[Whoopi], when your political views are so warped that you 1. Defend a child rapist cuz they agree with you, while 2. attacking children whose parents don’t, it may be time to seek professional help. Truly sick.”

“The comments came in response to what Goldberg said when she took a swipe at Trump Jr.’s sons over his interview with DailyMailTV, when Trump Jr. said he was more concerned right now for his three sons than his two daughters in “an age when lives can be ruined on both sides of he-said, she-said sexual misconduct claims.”

“His interview with Daily Mail came in light of sexual assault allegations brought against Supreme Court justice nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

“I mean, right now, I’d say my sons,” Trump Jr. explained. “I’ve got boys, and I’ve got girls. And when I see what’s going on right now, it’s scary.’”

Why do the hosts on ‘The View’ find it necessary to keep going after minors only because they don’t agree politically with the parents? First, evil Rosie O’Donnell fuels speculations that Barron Trump is autistic and now Whoopi takes it several steps further by suggesting Don Jr.’s son has violent tendencies? Why do they insist on picking on children?

Here is more info on the attacks on Barron Trump via The Huffington Post:

“This kid gives me the heebies.”

“I wonder if he is all there.”

“There were rumours that he was autistic. Looks plausible.”

“I’m not one to pick on kids… but he creeped me out”

“Of course this kid is autistic”…

“It’s a day of the week ending in Y, which means the internet has been hard at work playing its favourite game “speculating wildly about things we don’t actually know anything about”. This time round the topic is whether or not Barron Trump is on the autism spectrum.

“The basis for the speculation? Well, he’s “odd” isn’t he? He’s “different”. He’s not, you know, “normal”, based on the perception of normal that you have in your head. And so in rushes the internet, because who needs an actual professional diagnosis, or a deep understanding of the neurological condition, when you can see with your own two eyes that this kid is clearly autistic?

“All the quotes above come from a single Facebook thread, and there are hundreds if not thousands like it happening right now. A quick glance is enough to tell you that the people speculating about Barron’s alleged autism equate being on the spectrum with being creepy. Other adjectives flying around include “dead eyes” and “serial killer looks”.

“Let’s start by saying that Barron Trump should, in an ideal world, be left alone because he is a child. He’s a ten year old boy, who didn’t ask to be Donald Trump’s son, didn’t ask to be flung onto the world’s television screens. I’ve seen people arguing that “people were racist about Sasha and Malia so why should we leave Barron alone”. Well, it was Sasha and Malia’s own mother who said “When they go low, we go high.” If your motivation is a tit for tat with racists, then you should reconsider your decision making skills and indeed your life.

“How many of you leaping to diagnose Barron Trump have any experience with the autism spectrum? How many of you really know what Asperger’s or autism actually are?

“But equally worrying is that people feel fully entitled to speculate about whether or not somebody has a disability. Your very speculation is shockingly ableist behaviour that damages not only Barron Trump but every single person who is on the spectrum. By speculating, you are enforcing society’s desire to label anything which does not strictly adhere to “normal”. You are othering everybody on the spectrum. You are making it clear that you consider them acceptable targets for ridicule and attack.

“All those adjectives being used in the armchair diagnosis of Barron Trump, you are applying those to every single person on the spectrum, and perpetuating every single harmful, inaccurate stereotype that exists.

“Imagine if you continued this practice into real life. Imagine if you suddenly started commenting on your friends’ Facebook pictures saying “ooh, your kid looks creepy, do you think maybe he is on the autism spectrum?” If you wouldn’t do that to somebody you know, and so help us all I hope you wouldn’t, then why do you feel entitled to do that to Barron Trump?

“And let’s be honest for a second: how many of you leaping to diagnose Barron Trump have any experience with the autism spectrum? How many of you really know what Asperger’s or autism actually are? In case you’re suddenly realising that you don’t really know what it is, here’s a handy link. Autism spectrum disorders should only be made by qualified professionals – clinical psychologists who have spent time physically with someone before making a diagnosis.

“Also, any human being, yes even Donald Trump’s son, has the right to privacy, including privacy about whether or not they are on the autism spectrum. Attempting to force some kind of “confession” out of the Trump’s doesn’t benefit anyone, but it does violate that right. If Barron Trump is on the spectrum, then that is a matter for him and his family. If he is not on the spectrum, that is a matter for him and his family.

[…]

“If you feel tempted to speculate about whether or not Barron Trump is on the spectrum, please ask yourself why. Why does it matter to you? I can guarantee you that your speculation will not help anybody, but it could definitely hurt people.”

The above article has to be about the only fair and unbiased article I have ever read from the largely far-left liberal, all white woman run Huffington Post. Why would a child’s mental state be of concern to anyone other than their parents and teachers?

The left was the first to always say President Barack Hussein Obama’s daughters were off limits, and although the left always went after the Bush twins, the large majority of those of us on the right agreed and left them alone. So please, to all over the hill visually unpleasant has been celebrities, please leave the children alone!

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>